Matylda Burylo vs Mana Kawamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Aug at 08:23 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Burylo vs M. Kawamura

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Burylo 1 - 0 Kawamura
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matylda Burylo winning 2 and Mana Kawamura winning 1. The last match between Matylda Burylo and Mana Kawamura was at the W50 Bytom, 25-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Matylda Burylo getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Burylo | 1 |
Kawamura | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W50 Bytom(08-25-25)
M. Burylo vs M. Kawamura H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
47.69% (31-34) | Career Total W/L | 55.39% (149-120) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
0 | Titles | 1 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Burylo vs M. Kawamura Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Kawamura has recently won 41.48% of points on their second serve, compared to Burylo's 36.84%, indicating an advantage in longer rally scenarios.
- Return Game Prowess: Despite Kawamura having a slight edge in first serve returns (38.36%), Burylo is slightly stronger against second serves with a 50.3% win rate.
- Break Point Resilience: Under pressure, Burylo has saved 46.25% of breakpoints, narrowly surpassing Kawamura's 45.35% save rate.
- Overall Match Performance: In the past year, Burylo boasts a slightly higher match win percentage (47.37%) than Kawamura's 44%.
- Surface Specialization: Kawamura excels on clay with a 62% win rate, whereas Burylo in indoor hard courts with 53%, giving each player a distinct surface advantage.
- Tournament Level and Opponent Quality: Kawamura's experience at the Challenger level against opponents ranked on average 374.48 contrasts with Burylo's 261.71 in Futures events, suggesting exposure to different competitive levels.
- Deciding Set Performance: In closely contested matches, Burylo has had greater success, winning 50% of deciding sets compared to Kawamura's 31%.
- Break Point Conversion Efficiency: Burylo converts break points more effectively at 46%, while Kawamura converts at a slightly lower rate of 40.86%.
Editorial Prediction (August 25, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing contrast in playing styles and strengths. Kawamura appears to be the stronger player when it comes to maintaining rallies and defending against breakpoints, particularly on clay surfaces where they have historically excelled.
On the other hand, Burylo's robust play on indoor hard courts and ability to convert break points can provide an edge in critical moments of the match. Burylo's successful track record in deciding sets also suggests composure under high-pressure scenarios.
While each has their strengths, the dynamics of the match could tilt in favor of Burylo, whose overall recent performance and ability to play well under pressure may give them the advantage needed to secure the victory.
Matylda Burylo vs Mana Kawamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Burylo vs M. Kawamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 9 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:36:17 | Average Match Time | 2:36:17 |
60% (61/101) | 1st Serve % | 66% (49/74) |
62% (38/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (24/49) |
43% (17/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (4/16) |
51% (38/74) | Return Points Win % | 46% (46/101) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Burylo Recent Matches Played
M. Kawamura Recent Matches Played

M. Burylo vs M. Kawamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
47.69% (31/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.39% (149/120) |
46.67% (70/80) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.30% (344/267) |
48.90% (686/717) | Games Win/Loss | 53.97% (2924/2494) |
50.00% (10/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.59% (61/55) |
38.89% (7/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.47% (67/42) |
51.85% (14/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.50% (19/21) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
24 | Aces Total | 157 |
0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
101 | Total Double Faults | 516 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:20:33 |
262.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.34 |
65% (1274/1971) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9153/13966) |
54% (690/1274) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (5251/9153) |
45% (311/697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2191/4813) |
50% (107/212) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (932/1857) |
43% (846/1954) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6603/13795) |
33.33% (7/14) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (120/96) |
54.55% (24/20) | Futures W/L | 54.72% (29/24) |
48% (31/65) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (147/265) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
33% (3/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (20/36) |
60% (12/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (27/73) |
81% (26/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (165/137) |
19% (26/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (165/28) |
26% (39/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (104/12) |